
Download this article
- PDF (1.25 MB)
Back to the Table of Contents
|
Why Should We Bother to Communicate Astronomy? (page 30)
Will Gater
First Paragraph
I once attended a lecture on science communication by a prominent BBC radio producer. At the end of the lecture questions were taken by the producer on the ways in which science is communicated in the media and a lively discussion quickly arose. After covering the in and outs of target audiences, pitching articles and news pieces at the right level, the debate settled. Finally one postgraduate promptly raised his hand and proceeded to ask the producer something along the lines of: “Why should we even bother with science communication?” He then continued, emotively and quite genuinely, to argue that to try and explain his complex work would simplify it and, ultimately, belittle it. As he went on the room became quieter and quieter.
Comments about this article
BesseBide
06 Aug 2008, 05:16
Hi,
I have been reading this blog for some time now but never bothered to
comment until today. Wanted to let you know that I am a fan and enjoy your
work.
Thanks,
_________________
<a href=http://www.greencashmoney.com>penny stocks lists</a> |
<a href=http://www.greencashmoney.com>hot stock picks free</a>
| <a href=http://www.greencashmoney.com>review of stock picking
newsletters</a>
Raquel Shida
20 Feb 2008, 14:57
This is a very nice article, I agree that communicating astronomy is very
important!
|